Keep confidence tiers visible
Separate High- and Medium-confidence provider classifications instead of blending them into an unexplained lead count.
UCCContacts by YANETO · For MCA brokers and funders
Fresh UCC-1 filing data for MCA teams—32 states plus DC, delivered to your workflow.
Move from new filing activity to a focused research queue with secured-party filters, repeat-filing signals, available officer matches, and delivery by API, Google Sheets, or PostgreSQL.
Prefer to look first? Inspect the rotating public sample
Your sourcing stays private. Customer identities are never disclosed.
Clear commercial terms. Data lists are non-exclusive.
Source-aware delivery. Freshness depends on publication and ingestion.
Built for your workflow
Turn new filing activity into a repeatable research queue.
Review provider associations, repeat-filing context, and available owner matches without rebuilding the same list every week. Use a shared Sheet or connect the feed to your own systems.
Surface repeat-filing patterns
Use normalized debtor and address signals to identify records that merit further research without calling them verified stacking or active obligations.
Reduce list preparation
Filter and deliver structured filing data into an API workflow or the Google Sheet your team already reviews.
Find the right yes
Move faster from new filings to the right conversations.
Prioritize records using filing recency, provider associations, debtor state, repeat activity, and available officer details—then keep the supporting context attached as your team researches and reaches out.
Signals that can move a record into research.
- A listed-provider association with its confidence tier attached
- A debtor recorded in a state your team actively serves
- A repeat-filing pattern that merits additional investigation
- Owner or officer details where a reliable match is available
Checks that keep your research focused.
- An ambiguous provider candidate excluded from accepted results
- A filing agent or representative that does not identify the beneficial lender
- A populated phone field treated as verified contact information
- A filing interpreted as proof of stacking, demand, or an active obligation
See the data before you buy
See the filing structure—not a fictional mockup.
Inspect a rotating slice of real UCC filing records before sharing your information. Then request a larger sample delivered to your business email.
Open the live public sampleLive data previewRotates daily
100 real filing recordsTwenty-eight fields per record, available without signup through the public sample.
- Filing and amendment details
- Debtor and secured-party fields
- Repeat-filing indicators
- Officer details where matched
The public sample is a rotating slice, not a balanced state mix. Blank enrichment fields and coded values can appear.
The automated sample includes up to 25 recent records from each of 32 covered states plus Washington, DC. Tell us which states and providers matter in your request notes so we can understand your workflow.
One automated sample per verified business domain. Phone numbers and email addresses are excluded.
Request your sampleA practical alternative
Choose the path that fits your research operation.
| Current approach | Typical tradeoff | What UCCContacts changes |
|---|---|---|
| Buy a general lead list | Familiar and inexpensive, but not organized around a recent filing signal. | Structured filing data with filing dates, secured parties, and repeat-filing context. |
| Pull state portals by hand | Direct control, with repeated collection and spreadsheet preparation. | A recurring feed delivered to a Sheet or available through an API. |
| Build and maintain collection | Full control, plus ongoing maintenance when portals and formats change. | Multi-state collection and normalization without maintaining the source integrations yourself. |
What the data supports
Keep the provider confidence level attached to every count.
High-confidence provider associations
Distinct filing numbers dated Sep. 1–Oct. 13, 2026.
Medium-confidence provider associations
Kept separate from the High-confidence population.
Filings with a populated debtor phone field
196 High and 330 Medium. Populated and format-screened, not verified.
Distinct September UCC-1 filing numbers in the full dataset
Dataset scale only. This is not MCA volume.
Filing-date window: September 1–October 13, 2026, unless a card says September 2026. Measured October 14, 2026. Counts are distinct nonempty filing numbers after trimming and uppercasing, deduplicated across debtor rows. Filing numbers may not be unique across jurisdictions because the source has no filing-office jurisdiction field.
Filters and delivery
Shape the feed around the work.
Build a research feed around filing date, debtor state, secured party, confidence tier, and repeat-filing signals. Debtor state describes the state recorded for the debtor; it does not establish the filing-office jurisdiction.
Filing date Debtor state Secured party High / Medium confidence Repeat-filing signal
API in CSV or JSON
Pull available current or historical records with filters that fit your workflow.
Automated Google Sheets
Receive the current month’s backlog and new available records in a shared sheet, checked every 15 minutes.
Structured, research-ready fields
Work with debtor, filing, secured-party, repeat-filing, and available enrichment fields in a consistent format.
Method and limits
Association is not proof of the financing product.
- Provider classifications come only from the workbook’s Customer MCA List, rows 7–280. The Review Needed tab was excluded.
- All accepted database matches are exact after case and whitespace normalization. Medium means provider-classification confidence, not fuzzy matching.
- Non-exact and ambiguous candidates were excluded. The review queue contains 28 spellings covering 192 database rows, including unresolved candidates.
- Describe results as filings associated with listed MCA/RBF providers. A provider classification does not prove the product behind every filing.
- Phone presence does not verify ownership, current accuracy, reachability, consent, or sales potential.
Evaluate it with your team
Start with records you can inspect.
Request the complimentary sample, review the fields and limitations, and decide whether the feed fits your workflow.